How to fix our country:
We must bring our attention onto something greater than ourselves to establish a shared understanding and be able to be productive in life. Whether at the social level, in politics, the global economy, or in our everyday lives, we’ve got to be presenting our views from a certain state or frequency in order to be heard by one another. We cannot be the center of our own universe. It won’t work, because life itself doesn’t work that way.
The 5D mentality and ascension coming with the Age of Aquarius isn’t going to be ushered in automatically. It starts with us, right here and now. Live by example. Educate others on things like how our frequencies and vibrations affect one another and the world, living with an open heart, leaving a fear-driven mindset to one of love… All of that.
We are the ones to bring the world we desire into reality. It starts with us leading by example.
Ancient scripture says we need to live our lives with an open perspective—one that opens us up to limitless possibilities and extends beyond our physical self. Live life with regard to all things metaphysical, rather than from the mindset of man-made, egotistical fear (Romans 8:12-15).
Even in the New Testament, Jesus straight up told his followers, “if you are unable to believe (understand) what I’m telling you about this world, how would you be able to believe what I tell you about a world you don’t even know?” The world that Jesus was referring to was Heaven, as well as the metaphysical inner-functioning of our 3D world in relation to our existence.
We know that we need to learn from history. “Don’t let history repeat itself.” Well, read the Bible. Not just Christian texts, but other religions and even non-religious psuedospiritual texts… they all show the same thing.
How much do we as a society have to be beaten over the head with the idea that we need to expand our thinking, before we finally do it?
Or are we just waiting for a “Nehemiah moment”—a leader who is founded in beliefs, values and a perception greater than politics, the semantics of religion, and our own selves?
The Age of Aquarius, the New Earth, the Ascension… whatever you’d like to call it… it’s already been written in Time that its occurred. All we have to do now is enact it and bring it to fruition. But to do that, we have to approach our view on life, our selves, our souls, and even our daily activities and interactions from a perspective that is greater than our individual, physical self.
Expand your mind. See the limitless potential God created for us.
“How is reading texts intended to indoctrinate and control people expanding your mind? I would like further explanation please ☺️”
If you’re referring to the “reading scripture” part, there is an education component required for every aspect of living. From learning about monad soul groups, concepts of the oversoul, quantum physics (timeline theories, past/future relationship, etc.), to understanding the value of mindfulness, shadow work, and so on. Scripture isn’t a list of rules. It’s a historical account of human nature. It reinforces the connection between physical and non-physical. It shows us the ability of things like dreams, meditation, and prayer (manifestation), and not only encourages this, but also simultaneously provides a sense of values, belief, and a solid foundation in faith of something greater, outside of ourselves.
I’m not saying everyone should read the Bible or other religious text. I’m saying that the people who were called to enact their mission—whose life path is being activated right now to do so—need to be the change we want to see. Not just live a good life, but have our actions grounded in a strong foundation. Because that is required to hold strong when we reach a time of being challenged. It keeps others who may try to put us off our path from distracting us with illusionary things, bc the level we’re operating on can’t be phased by that type of thing.
“Keep religion out of everything, except for the individual.”
It’s not about religion. The individual *is* their beliefs, morals, values, etc. Their intrinsic traits – from our likes/dislikes in our taste of music, our view on the division of political power, to our belief in God/Source/Spirit/”Law of One” – are what’s used in the compilation of what makes said individual.
You bring up something interesting: I was hesitant to reference the Bible, God, and Christianity in my post (even though I tried also mentioning that ANY spiritual, faith-based type of belief (including one of science, where the only “belief” is that it is possible that there is much beyond our 3D world, whether divine or otherwise) in fear of people skimming their feeds, seeing those words, and not being able to capture the real point of what I was saying.
Bc that’s exactly my point. We are so distracted by the material world, so long as our egos continue to drive our decisions in how we choose to process or evaluate things (unable to go outside of our Self to raise our level to be able to connect the bigger picture & have productive discussions that don’t get pigeon holed or too deep in the rabbit hole), and so long as we as a nation continue to go the direction we’re going in with NO common understanding to provide equal footing *to* have these discussions…. We allow illusions, complacency, and fear to rule, to where now we are in such an odd place, we can’t even have a transition of power on a controversial subject (abortion) without the world blowing up. We’ve got to become grounded in something.
Even if religion isn’t your cup of tea, the discoveries in quantum science are astounding. Psuedospirituality is also rapidly progressing—I myself have had very deep transcendental experiences, able to connect with something greater. Science and religion… and even the “wild” claims of alien starseed souls… it all makes sense when you step out of the everyday mindset.
“Hey I’m trying here! Harder than it sounds! You extraterrestrials* heard of positive reinforcement and thanking? You could do more of that. Thanking us, encouraging, etc.”
*Posted on a Starseed forum.
Whether human or ET, a soul is a soul is a soul. When we start identifying as our SOUL, rather than our physical bodies or past existences (which yes, they are important bc these things make up who we are, but to identify in the present day with them is different), we’ll be able to better practice positive reinforcement, gratitude, understandings of how higher frequencies and vibrations affect the flow of our world, and so on.
Positive reinforcement is a must. But you can’t have positive (or negative) reinforcement unless the person doing the enforcement is able to sit outside of their ego to then determine which method to use. That’s what I was trying to get at:
Like a parent to their child, when a child acts out, the parent has an expanded concept of the child’s situation. The parent has “been there, done that,” and is applying wisdom and prudence to the situation, from their point of view. When their parent scolds them, they become upset because in their minds, their actions and decisions make sense—theh fit in their world. But the child’s world is not the same as the parent’s world. The two are approaching the situation from very different places.
The parent is approaching the situation from a level that considers not only the child’s actions, but also the effect of their actions on the child’s future. The parent also has knowledge that the child doesn’t, like “fire is hot.” This doesn’t make the parent “better” or superior to the child. They are just at two different points in their development. The child, however, doesn’t see it this way. They feel they are being unfairly disciplined or even oppressed.
The lesson here is that many of us are operating on the level of the child. Our “world” is small and we put our immediate needs first, because we have yet to learn that immaterial concepts like patience, time, etc. are factors; that even though we cannot see or touch these things, they have am effect on the physical world. The same goes for spirituality, divinity, morality, intuition, and things of that nature. This is what we must set the example for others to come around to.
Back to the parent-child example: There is usually a fight or major disagreement or flare of emotion between them in this process. After that exchange, as the child grows and expands their perception, they realize that the adult was operating from a place of love and begin to accept and understand why the parent chose to react that way. But we are not children. So when we are responding to something in the moment, we should be able to apply that same broadened mindset to how we interact with others. Sadly, we are not doing that (Er… not enough of us aren’t).
In this example, the average person within the masses would be the child. The conscious person with an expanded perspective of the world would be the parent.
TL;DR: In order to apply any type of reinforcement to any conscious being, the one applying it must first have the objectivity to be able to evaluate which route is best.
Many of us have awakened. But majority of people, the part of society that the media focuses on, is still living in a world of subjectivity—distracted by the 3D illusions, the concept that their Self is defined as their physical body (hence, they are the center of their universe and all their thoughts are formed from the perspective of self-preservation, because there is nothing greater than themselves in their mind).
This group of people is still in a learning curve. It is the responsibility of the “wise old souls”, the starseeds, the Twin Flames, and other awakened souls to assist them along that curve. This is what will bring in the Age of Aquarius, take us further up into ascension, closer to the New Earth that the Bible promises, or however you choose to perceive it.
This is not only a spiritual mission. It affects politics, society, economics, and every facet of life that humans have built.
Using the 2022 Roe v. Wade Decision & Abortion as an Example
When the country is going back and forth about the 2022 Roe v Wade decision and the topic of abortion for months on end with no development or progress in our discussions, it’s because we’re not even within the same conversation.
People need to come into the conversation with the right mindset or approach about the topic. This means understanding the multifaceted topics associated with abortion and how each of them may trigger an emotional vs. logical reaction in us. It requires a mindful, purposeful approach in order to have a productive conversation. For instance, is the discussion around the legal aspect or morality of abortion? We can only realistically talk about one aspect at a time without it turning into a cluster storm.
We are in a conversation spouting topics into our national echo chamber of things like that the emotional effects that a child who is unwanted and had to be born because an abortion was not readily accessible are greater than the issues the abortion itself brings up. But then on the other side, we are conversing about the sanctity of a life in regard to unborn babies. So, one group is discussing potential emotional issues one will need to work through in life (which, don’t we all have those?) and the other is coming into the conversation from a very different level: one of life, itself. The magnitude of the two approaches varies so greatly, that neither side can actually hear one another. It doesn’t work. The frequencies each group is on are too great in distance (referring to the Power vs. Force, Map of Consciousness by Dr. David Hawkins).
Once the discussion begins, still using abortion and Roe v Wade as an example, the associations of the topics involved with this conversation are so intertangled, it’s too triggering. We get lost in a sea of babble, allowing others’ comments to blind us with conviction or lead us down a rabbit hole. It’s an issue of the self – some of us are still operating from a perspective that we are the center of our worlds; that we must be right, because we identify our existence with superficial, illusory concepts like public acceptance of our beliefs. Thereby, it’s possible that if we remove this belief and shift to a mindset where we identify with inner qualities, we’d be able to have a productive discussion together.
For example, if someone measures their personal validation by something as materialistic as the power or authority they exert over others, such as a dictator or high-level commander, they will likely abuse this power. They are trying to use force, rather than harness their own power. Somewhere along the way, they missed the lesson that true value is measured by humility, integrity, and other non-material traits within themselves.
Society has not fully evolved to teach that fulfillment, purpose, and identity are inner, self traits – not things that can be sought in external factors outside of ourselves. This is the fundamental flaw that’s causing issues. When one side of a controversial topic is coming at the issue from the angle of materialistic, 3D principles, and the other is looking at it from a different perspective, we’ll never make progress as a nation.
We’ve also got to realize the difference between bringing up a topic to drive awareness to it, versus ranting and raving about something in a way that is low vibrational. For example, a news video giving an update on the Roe v Wade decision that is merely describing the facts does not contain a “negative” or low frequency. A news video that leans to one side of the political spectrum or the other may include insults about the other party, talk about how crazy it is for the other side’s protest of the issue, and ultimately end up putting off a harmful, low frequency that does nothing to progress or uplift us, as a collective.
The media and society has allowed the country to become so sensitized and triggered by just the mention of a controversial word like “abortion”, that even if we are only talking about a shift in power from the Federal government to the states, which gives the power back to the people to either allow or restrict abortions, but then we see these reaction videos of women hysterically crying as if they’ve just learned their own child has died (kind of ironic right?), they are not equal or proportionate responses to what actually happened. Because we’ve allowed the country to get away with this type of polarization and to accept things that drive disproportionate hysterics.
“Remember that time in the Old testament in the Bible where God killed babies from like some evil people, an evil Nation? Yeah, well if every life mattered, He didn’t spare them.”
“Mattered”, in what context? How WE would judge what matters here in our worldly material life? Or if a life matters in the way that our divine God would define that, from the perspective of our actual existence (our souls… our nonphysical form, which lives beyond spatial reality, within Creation across time.).
Making such a statement shows a misunderstanding of the Bible, of the Jewish people’s history, of God’s intention in His actions, and shows a concerning sense of self-centric thinking. In that you’re making judgements & rationality based on YOUR view of what matters, as if you’ve already got all the answers to what God then does with the souls of the babies he allowed to be killed during certain slaughtering and wars, or how His actions were then used to raise the Hebrews up from a nation of slaves and into a global world power (back then).
It’s not such a simple matter. We can’t make judgement calls about something on this level by using our singular means of thought. It’s a multidimensional topic, and must be viewed and discussed as such.
We must reframe our thinking. Readjust the way in which we value and consider ourselves, our values, and put the focus back on something greater than us. Whether that something is God or simply the wellbeing of the country, either way it will achieve the goal of enabling us to separate the numerous issues and things involved with abortion into bite sized chunks we can actually work with.
It’s not just abortion. Or even political topics. Even in our everyday lives and social interactions, we are living in this small minded, closed world way of thinking where we are the center of our own universes.
We cannot be the center of our own universe. It won’t work, because life itself doesn’t work that way. The universe is much more complex. It is interconnected and entangled together – one thing always effects another thing within it, and it’s occurring at multiple levels and dimensions. Just as the topic of abortion is riddled with sub-topics and associated entities that can trigger a mix of logical, emotional, moral, legal, and a slew of other things. It’s the same concept.
In order for this change to happen, we need to better understand how our brains work (neural pathways and mapping), the science behind reality and how things in our universe are connected, and concepts of spirituality (not necessarily religious spirituality) within the self. There is much depth to the things we are trying to discuss. Understanding these complexities is required to shift our perception and create a level playing field to have these important discussions.
Please let me know which country you refer to (I can see no specific mention) I am in the UK – been awake for 40 years and am now 75 years old having been a walk in. thank you.
Hi Barbara. I’m in the US (East Coast). Thank you for asking. It’s a pleasure to connect with you!